No, I'm just telling you, that you could do it in the past (not so distant past).Did you just give me advice to go to the top of the spire to win libraries that are no longer available (and that you yourself said are no longer available)?
And that perfectly sums up the problem. We want them to stay in storage so that the markets can recover.And you might have some additional ones still in inventory.
Thanks @iDavis - is this the full list? Six buildings plus the Phoenix seems less than in previous events ...For those of you, who were used to use my building tables on CZ forum, I have created and transferred them to my new platform, which, in addition to other new features, also finally allowed me to implement the full evolving building display feature, as well as new comparison and filter tools for the event buildings.
All the new buildings from this event are already published there.
read "a better source" because if it ain't "better" nobody will replace it.They will stay in the cities until another source of additional CCs will be introduced.
They will stay in the cities until another source of additional CCs will be introduced.
I have always insisted that the entire Evolution buildings provide the players with resources that are rare, but the structure is almost always the same (coins and supplies and then some scrap and knowledge points) Mainly because of the knowledge points, the Evos are provided, possibly because they're pretty ... really useful? hardly likely.read "a better source" because if it ain't "better" nobody will replace it.
Not really, it doesn’t have to be better (or even OP). The idea isn’t from my head, but I like it’s simplicity: the most basic fix (apart from modifying the Library set itself) would be to introduce new, almost identical set in the Spire. The difference would be T2+x production (where x is 0, 1 or 2).From my point of view it will be impossible to get the players to delete the library set, because Inno would have to give something that is even worse than the set ... bad in this case means even more OP.
I know I wouldn't replace my 4 sets at all no matter what. Why? Because I still have 6 normal T2 factories, and if you give me another set that efficiently gives me more T2 and some other goodies I'll replace my factories, not my moonset.Not really, it doesn’t have to be better (or even OP). The idea isn’t from my head, but I like it’s simplicity: the most basic fix (apart from modifying the Library set itself) would be to introduce new, almost identical set in the Spire. The difference would be T2+x production (where x is 0, 1 or 2).
It would take time, but eventually people would naturally replace their Library sets with the newly won sets.
But if you've replaced those 6 factories and then you get more new-style sets...I know I wouldn't replace my 4 sets at all no matter what. Why? Because I still have 6 normal T2 factories, and if you give me another set that efficiently gives me more T2 and some other goodies I'll replace my factories, not my moonset.
I hadn't even noticed. Probably because the event offersNot sure how discussing the library set took over the event thread
I hadn't even noticed. Probably because the event offers
Doesn't level much to talk about.
- uninteresting daily prizes
- uninteresting quests
- uninteresting grand prize
- uninteresting chest system
We were discussing the artifact craft for 10k fragments and whether it could lead to more libraries being placed. Technically this is part of the event.Not sure how discussing the library set took over the event thread,