FINALLY! Our FS (live) REQUIRES c/t trades of 4:2:1, instead of the grossly inflated 16:4:1, so this will much closer reflect the proper production value as well as material value of the offered goods. DO IT!
In terms of ratios, I am generally quite happy to accept tier3:tier2 or tier2:tier1 at a ratio of 1:2.5 ... and 2 tier difference at a ratio of 1:5 ...
These are simply the values of trade I am willing to accept, not the specific ratio I am proposing is adopted. Consider it an approximation, nothing more.I just wanted to mention that 2 tier difference has to be the square of 1 tier difference. In your example of 1:2.5 for 1 tier, it would be 1:6.25 for 2 tiers.In terms of ratios, I am generally quite happy to accept tier3:tier2 or tier2:tier1 at a ratio of 1:2.5 or better, e.g. 1000 elixir for 2500 crystal, and 2 tier difference at a ratio of 1:5 or better, e.g 1000 elixir for 5000 marble.
Am I the only understanding that the proposed change is only cosmetic?
meaning you can still only propose a t1 for t2 between 1:1 and 1:16, regardless of the "fairness stars" displayed?
IMHO you need to be able to go from 2:1 to 1:8, to make up for the change