Deleted User - 86059
Guest
Thanks, yes we are aware and getting checked out now
I honestly suspect it will go the other way. I mean the prize for gold is so extremly powerfull, there is no way a fixed system would (or should) give them out for any less than completeness (i.e. all quests, all log ins and gathering from around your city). But with the competitive system it could be possible to get gold for far less effort (because everyone else is failing as well).If the success of others causes your failure, that's PvP as far as I'm concerned.
Thankfully in the FA the top prizes are crap so it doesn't matter, but now Set buildings are on the line?
I'm pretty confident that I'll make a top ranking, but that also means that because of my success someone else will fail.
I hate this direction.
Right. My last try.10 000 registered players is not the same as 10 000 active players, as I already cited, information for now is that inactive players wont count (otherwise I would not count alts as problem, since we have enough players who left to replace alts in the example). Tournament gives not reliable data of less then 2 500 players (but 100% active).
And one other example. No 100 alts this time (this number was needed only to get everyone gold).
If every active player will create 1 alt
I think there is a difference.If the success of others causes your failure, that's PvP as far as I'm concerned.
Thankfully in the FA the top prizes are crap so it doesn't matter, but now Set buildings are on the line?
I'm pretty confident that I'll make a top ranking, but that also means that because of my success someone else will fail.
I hate this direction.
That's called 1v1PvP is litterally player versus player, one against one and you both know who your opponent is.
Let’s assume hypothetical situation: a fellow in your fellowships ends up out of the top league despite his best effort and finishing everything. He might as well be the “first under the line”, you can’t know that. But you manage to place in the top league. Does it really matter that it wasn’t you personally pushing specifically him out? Well, actually it was you - it was your success (and probably someone else’s as well) that caused his failure.Still, this competition that we are getting here now is different I think (and hope!!!)
Because we will not be able to point at anybody specific causing us to win or loose. I think and hope it will be a competition in a sporty atmosphere.
Nothing other players did could harm us.
It's dynamic. 76+ was what the top 1% had for points, you have 78 so you arein the top 1%While typing here I forgot its name and went back to look and now I am back to Silver?
I think we’ll have to agree to disagree. ;-) But there is one thing I really need to comment. You used the Spire as the argument against my view of the matter. The Spire is actually the perfect example of the opposite principle: getting better not worse rewards when also other people work on the same goal.I assume that we are all adults here in this game and that we allow each other something.
That is why I think and hope this competition can be played in a sporty atmosphere.
I have enough faith in most people around here to expect that we can do that.
If you play the Spire, you know that this is not the case here.
If you get to the top, but other fellows are failing to reach the top, you will not get the gold reward with 275 dia's.
If you play in an Fellowship Adventure and you do your best to fill the routes to get your chests, but others in your FS don't, you won't get rewarded.
And if you do, but other Fellowships do better, than all of your Fellowship gets rewarded with smaller rewards.
(Ok, true, they s*** anyway, but I think I made my point here.)
My guess is if you gain 1 staff you are "active" for the eventWhat I was wondering about is, when is a player determined as 'active'?
That's a co-op goal. There's an important difference between your teammates not helping you and strangers harming you.If you play the Spire, you know that this is not the case here.
If you get to the top, but other fellows are failing to reach the top, you will not get the gold reward with 275 dia's.
See above.If you play in an Fellowship Adventure and you do your best to fill the routes to get your chests, but others in your FS don't, you won't get rewarded.
Yes, and it's what we hate about the FA too.And if you do, but other Fellowships do better, than all of your Fellowship gets rewarded with smaller rewards.
Beside not giving us bit of time to breathe, they also aren't in any hurry to find a way to implement a "vacation mode". Soon the summer is here and if I can go in holiday (Covid restrictions aso) I might not come back if a vacation mode isn't implemented by then. There's no fun in coming back after some weeks and find all decaying goods GONE!We were in the middle of the May event, and you already started June event, and you already added July event to the files... You don't give any space for chapter progression or rest between events...