1. Dear forum reader,

    To actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, you need a game account and to REGISTER HERE!
    Dismiss Notice

Discussion Royal Restoration Spell

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Marindor, Dec 18, 2018.

  1. Bruce the Fierce

    Bruce the Fierce Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2018
    This solution doesn't fix the Purchased Building problem. If future tournaments only give 11 RR then it takes 2 or more tournaments to upgrade one workshop. A single blue print would currently do that. So it is a significant penalty to purchased buildings. It is very unwise for Inno to make purchased buildings less valuable to existing owners and less attractive to future buyers.
     
    Lelanya and slide like this.
  2. NoNeZ

    NoNeZ Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2016
    So,at least 17 RR per tournament.
     
  3. ExplorerFfff

    ExplorerFfff New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2018
    No sum of spells will provide the same conditions for magical buildings!

    You need to set a conversion rate that will match the upper limit of magic buildings enhancements.

    For example: in tournament 15RR = upgrade of magical building 8-15RR max, etc.

    If there is no upper limit there will be a major penalty sooner or later for older players.
     
  4. Stella Solaris

    Stella Solaris Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Picking up the idea of CiraKelley as it comes pretty close to what I have in mind already since this discussion started - why not let people decide what they want to use their blueprints/RRs for? Like: make it convertible. Magical buildings still upgrade by blueprints at a conversion rate of 1:10 (10RRs are 1 blueprint which upgrades EVERY magical building for 1 level) and RRs upgrade whatever event building by 1 RR per square. From my (albeit limited) understanding of programming this would be a quite easy to implement solution without starting from scratch.

    Stays the problem of devaluating the 10 chest tournament effort by releasing RRs already at lower ranks of the tournament. And I am not talking about beta here, but life servers. Most of us are on beta for helping the game, try new implemetations first, etc but not for hunting ranks and points. But many of us are on life servers, with fellowships in high tourney performance because we want the max. This still should be rewarded with something secial that is only given to those who acchieve a certain level in tourneys by good team work week after week.
     
  5. Richord

    Richord Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2018
    good idea.
    No idea what is easy here; but maybe introduce new spell that can be produced but also comes with 10th chest.
    And conversion in MA, preferably short time, because any effort besides getting the blueprint instantly= paying players (and others) don't want.
     
  6. CrazyWizard

    CrazyWizard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2016
    It's not just the conversion:

    -New tournament gives only 11 BP, which is not enough to sustain people's magic buildings people bought with BP in mind.
    -Devaluation of the achievement to reach 10 chests in the tournament because to much is given at the beginning of the tournament.
     
    EdwardTrunk, Mykan and SoggyShorts like this.
  7. Jasper

    Jasper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    @Marindor: Will this be corrected ???? :eek:o_O:confused:
     
    Angeduciel likes this.
  8. Rando

    Rando New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2018
    When to expect your return on the ru-forum?
     
  9. edeba

    edeba Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2017
    So, my live sever game has been sharing and discussing information about other games since the 10-11:1 conversion of restoration spells to blueprints. Some have started playing other games.

    Inno has made decisions that have resulted in players quitting, like nerfing the crystal lighthouse and wholesaler, but how my f/s is sharing information on other games is quite concerning. It reminds me of the demise of a facebook game, Castleville, where it seemed that my entire game network switched to play a game by a relatively unknown developer, Royal Story by Funplus, because of just getting fed up. Castleville was maxed at 26 million players and by 2013 people were so annoyed, hundreds of game players in my network deserted Castleville for royal story, and they were all strong gamers and just pulled all of their friends by recommending the game and a year and half later castleville announced it was shutting down, and Funplus ended up with close to a billion dollar buyout, https://venturebeat.com/2014/08/19/...bsidiary-to-chinese-holding-company-for-960m/.

    Gamers like their games, but from what I've seen, there is a breaking point.

    Online games are far more expensive to maintain than a boxed game, but a boxed game is a comparison for value for players and when you can't see that players that spend $20-100/month are golden and fail to nurture that investment and instead try to exploit it and squeeze it for more, to a gross level of dissatisfaction in what players deem as value for their investment, well, fickle can come over night. I've seen it happen and I see a very strong under current of dissonance happening right now.
     
  10. SoggyShorts

    SoggyShorts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2016
  11. Bruce the Fierce

    Bruce the Fierce Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2018
    @edeba Please suggest another good game. I am 6 months Free from Warcraft and I dont want to go back to that addiction. I am trying Seaport but I dont think there is much there.
     
    SoggyShorts likes this.
  12. edeba

    edeba Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2017
    I don't remember. I don't want to start playing another game, but others tried it and were discussing it and seem to like it.

     
    PrimroseSylvia likes this.
  13. PrimroseSylvia

    PrimroseSylvia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2016
    Awn, Castleville! It was so fun at the beginning, and so boring some months later...
     
    Wowwie likes this.
  14. Richord

    Richord Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2018
    @CrazyWizard that's why i suggested (to meet in the middle) to give those spells only in 8th(?) 9th and 10th chest. certainly not before.
    I really hope they make some changes. they pretty much have to.
    However, not much listening going on, so I won't be surprised if the changes aren't great.
     
    EdwardTrunk and Wowwie like this.
  15. Dony

    Dony King of Bugs

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    the fact alone that we can upgrade event buildings is great nevertheless
     
    Wowwie, Lelanya and alpha-74 like this.
  16. Richord

    Richord Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2018
    well, that was the plan before the blueprint came along. so 'great' more like 'finally'.
     
    edeba likes this.
  17. edeba

    edeba Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2017
    Finally, and now still not here because of the gross downgrade in rewards.

     
    Wowwie likes this.
  18. conqueror9

    conqueror9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2015
    FoE or Elvenar Game world
     
  19. NoNeZ

    NoNeZ Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2016
    I don`t like moderation on ru-forum ;P
     
  20. Dony

    Dony King of Bugs

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    lets just hope that rebalancing wont take another year :)
     
    Wowwie likes this.

Top