IMO there is no reason for some of those to exist.Furthermore each color identify 2 different istants... both 30AK and 20AK are purple, both 15AK and 10AK are orange, both 7AK and 5AK are blue, so is impossible to understand what it is the reward...
ehm... sorry, but noIMO there is no reason for some of those to exist.
It's like money- would anyone even notice if the $10 bill suddenly went away? What's the worst possible scenario if it did? 3x$5 instead of $5+$10?
Would anyone care if they got 20 KP + 5KP + 5KP instead of 30 KP?
Does it have to be? I see rewards that are 2x5 KP rewards, so why does a 10KP pack need to exist?ehm... sorry, but no
first, the reward is sometimes a single one istant
I'm sorry, could you explain that again to me?second, there is difference in the game between istants of different sizes, is not the same from the strategic point of view 1 20AK instead of 2 10AK, then for me both the options are coinceivables
do you spend indifferently 10 KP or 5 KP on AW?What difference does it make if you get two 5KP rewards instead of one 10 KP reward?
I think we are having a language barrier here, I still have no idea why you don't want all of the 10 and 20 KP in the game changed to 2x5kp and 4x5kp.do you spend indifferently 10 KP or 5 KP on AW?
2 blue is 2 5KP, why not 2 7KP? It seems to you logic first hypothesis just because you already know this
probably, for my fault I try again..I think we are having a language barrier here, I still have no idea why you don't want all of the 10 and 20 KP in the game changed to 2x5kp and 4x5kp.
it's even easier add a little number on istant's icon and read the valueand it's certainly easier than teaching new players what green, blue, other blue, orange, purple and other purple mean
Right, so 5x4kp is easier to use, no downside for the player. Yes it makes the game a tiny tiny bit easier, but I don't think that is bad.for example, 20AK means to put 20 PC all in the same AW, whit 4x5AK is possible to put them on 4 differents AW.
Yeah, I'd be ok with that too as it was my first suggestion earlier, but all 5s is still my preference.it's even easier add a little number on istant's icon and read the value
Using "colour only" to display something (which is tiny <or too small> in shape) is
discrimination against those
who is colour-blind, colour-weakness and those who has eye's problem to see things clearly
@elvenstats would probably gather that info a bit later when this change come to live servers. He already have a script for that, but need updated info about many cities all over the world to get close to full info (even parsing all cities available at elvenstats one time doesn't give full info, so need to update that table from time to time).So... Has anyone attempted to make a table for the new rewards for the wonders? Is there any kind of joint effort happening here? I could attempt to help fill in a few...
20KP +5KP +5KP is far more superior then 1 time 30 kp tho, unless if you want to spend big numbers quickly, but how often does that happen.IMO there is no reason for some of those to exist.
It's like money- would anyone even notice if the $10 bill suddenly went away? What's the worst possible scenario if it did? 3x$5 instead of $5+$10?
Would anyone care if they got 20 KP + 5KP + 5KP instead of 30 KP?
I don't know why they wouldn't though. Other than having a fancy little color coded "rarity" system that is actually not very helpful, it doesn't add anything to the game.So ofcourse i would prefer many smaller ones over the bigger ones, but think thats not what the devs want to give out.
This could be great IF the 'packaged' KPs can to used everywhere, like on meeting tech tree kp needs. If the packs are only good on AWBs then that is not good for me who uses the kps gained in tournaments to complete tech tree requirements.
any news?Thanks Dony, I'll check and get back to you with an answer!
any news?