Search results

So you are just comparing 500 to 550. And (say) 700 to 750 and saying former is better. I just see both as 50 addition. Can’t debate with the secondary effects on AWs. I like the mana from da etc.,

Go to the actual city layout and check reports for aw levels. Or use thrones of high men on app, even if not built :)

I’m an elf. I just have to use time instants differently. Welcome this change.

Variables are for ease of use. In case Inno rebalances, it’s easy to meddle with them. Even Cal is an intermediate variable that gets lost into the formula / end result.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they make AWs undeletable and give anti-kp from tournaments to downgrade AWs.

I’m just exhausted. Not entertained.

It looks interesting if you break it into pieces. But for an overall city, of reasonable expansions, the entire weekly production and sum of catering 20 provinces, 6 rounds will be way off limits.

I’d predict the next chapter to have something to do about this. Probably AWs. But yeah, it’s a challenge to stay until next chapter

No. You get punished for it.

Do you mean to say the bases are appearing again for crafting. and it appears even if you have 1 in city? can anyone confirm please.

Please quit the cat and mouse game Marindor. The game doesn’t irritate me per say, than the dishonesty/ misleading wordings. (from mountain hall output to your current statement) Is it too difficult to be clear and precise.

Also should check if weights have been added to different AWs.

I’m ready to stall my city and change one parameter at a time. if 10-20 of us do that, I’m sure we can figure most/almost all the variables.

Probably re worked? Would me nice if slightly different combos occur. Can spend some time re-strategising.

When I realized how much exactly mountain hall added to goods, the very first time, I felt totally cheated. Also sanctuary that said 104.5% was 4.5% in addition ... Honesty was never part of the package.

Thanks. Just wanted to confirm that with the re-worked model this week. I don’t want to be double punished for doing them.

Though multiple solutions can be found for curve fitting (aka data) we can figure out the exact dependency by changing one parameter at a time and checking next week SS. Please don’t underestimate our optimization specialists. And the coke example. But here things can be quantified and not...

The reason is every other factor is multiplicative. I believe tech tree is the monster - as techs completed is one big number PS : @MinMax Gamer @Dony interested to know if optional techs are still discounted from costs.That info can help us decide whether to do those optical SS tech (optional...

I’m starting to suspect : do boosters buildings actually do what they are supposed to and to the correct %. we never know auto battling.

Art has always been 5* Probably Inno is right brained. Very artistic but 0 logic ;) PS : (Really wish their game balancing department aspire to meet the high standards set by the art department)