@SyreArca @Kersepitje : In English, if something can "get lost", the immediate common-sense understanding is that it is lost
by someone or something (which is often themselves - e.g. "I went to London and got lost in Mayfair" - we don't say "I lost myself", as would be said in French, for example) with the strong implication that the thing in question can/could be found again. This grammatical construction refers almost always to
physical entities [which in Elvenar = buildings]. The Wiki states that some things "get lost", but (?) appears to actually
mean that those things "
are lost" - and
this grammatical construction [adjective] means that the thing or things
have become permanently lost and therefore may
never be found again.
A common way to say, for example, that someone has died is to say that they "are lost" - never that they "got lost". There is a major difference.
Or in other words : in English, to "get lost" means that "being found again" is the immediate assumption. To "be lost" means "permanently gone".
Grammatically speaking - the diffference is that one version uses an adjective (the thing [itself] has become lost - its inherent status is now "that of having been lost") and the other uses the object form of a verb (the thing was lost [by someone or something else] and may be found again).
In English, the verb "to lose" is very complex, with several different meanings and constructions, and best avoided if certainty of meaning is not ensured. Alternatively, using "consumed" instead of "lost" has ONE meaning and would be readily understood - if that is the intended Wiki meaning?
Perhaps this helps?